My name is Michael. Born 1962. I'm a union lawyer in Boston USA.
My wife is very tolerant of my obsessive chess. Well, up to a point.
I play soccer (goalkeeper). I love Shakespeare, George Orwell and the Clash.
There are a lot of friendly people on ICC, like oldtymer from zimbabwe, shahriar from virginia, aubrey from edinburgh, yourkingmustdie from maryland and hibou from paris. I'd rather play with good-natured opponents than a bunch of rude fanatics. What's the point of being a fanatic if it
I worry that soon some mad scientist will solve chess with a super-computer.
Will "rational" chess be a draw? Will it be a forced win for white? If so, will it be Queen's Gambit? Or will the apocalypse come in some weird hypermodern opening?
Or maybe the solution will be a forced win for black! The opening position could turn out to be a zugzwang! (You move, you lose.) Now that would be a nasty little joke for God to bury in the mathematics.
Either way, the end of history will be such a bore. Once a machine plays perfect chess, no one will remember Kasparov or Fischer. Nobody will really think anymore -- we'll just be trying to copy the mind of the machine. Perfection kills poetry.
Guy Fawkes tried to blow up Parliament. I don't know why. I'm sure he had his reasons. He failed, but people remember him anyway. What a metaphor!
What good is chess, if it's just a cold sadistic ritual? Real chess is chaos and compassion and wit. See you on line. Peace and love--
Type | Rating | Best | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type | Wild | Rating | 1016 | Best | |
Type | Blitz | Rating | 1497 | Best | 1650 (25/Aug/2004) |
Type | Standard | Rating | 1686 | Best | 1754 (26/Apr/2001) |
Type | Bullet | Rating | 1133 | Best | |
Type | 5-minute | Rating | 1770 | Best | |
Type | 1-minute | Rating | 1120 | Best |